Skip to content

CE5855-48T4XS vs CE6863-48S6CQ

Compared products: CE5855-48T4XS,CE6863-48S6CQ

Overview

Comparison based on QianliSwitch catalog records. No prices, stock counts, or unnamed customer projects are claimed.

Comparison summary

CE5855-48T4XS and CE6863-48S6CQ are distinct manufacturer PIDs. Published differences that can be traced in the catalog include Downlink ports, Uplink ports, Switching capacity, Forwarding rate.

Use this page to decide which PID belongs on an RFQ. Do not treat one SKU as a drop-in replacement without matching media, uplink, and software/license lines on each product page.

Specification comparison table

Values below are copied from catalog fields on each product. Empty catalog fields stay “Not published in catalog” rather than guessed.

Field CE5855-48T4XS CE6863-48S6CQ
Manufacturer model CE5855-48T4XS CE6863-48S6CQ
Brand Huawei Huawei
Downlink ports 48 RJ45 48 × SFP28
Uplink ports 4 × SFP+ 6 × QSFP28
Port speed Not published in catalog 25G
Layer / role data-center data-center
Switching capacity 336 Gbps 3.6 Tbps
Forwarding rate 252 Mpps 940 Mpps
PoE Not published in catalog Non-PoE
PoE standard Not published in catalog Not published in catalog
PoE budget Not published in catalog Not published in catalog
Stacking / HA Front-to-back, switchable Up to 16 in-stack switches, long-reach stack links
VXLAN Not published in catalog Not published in catalog
MLAG Not published in catalog Not published in catalog

Port / speed difference

CE5855-48T4XS downlink: 48 RJ45. Uplink: 4 × SFP+.

CE6863-48S6CQ downlink: 48 × SFP28. Uplink: 6 × QSFP28.

If the design is locked to a faceplate (copper vs SFP+/SFP28/QSFP28 counts), choose the PID whose published map matches the optic plan. Do not infer a missing uplink from a sibling SKU.

Performance difference

Published switching capacity: CE5855-48T4XS 336 Gbps; CE6863-48S6CQ 3.6 Tbps. Forwarding: CE5855-48T4XS 252 Mpps; CE6863-48S6CQ 940 Mpps.

Capacity figures are catalog statements, not lab benchmarks. Confirm oversubscription against the actual downlink/uplink mix before buying optics.

PoE / feature difference

PoE: CE5855-48T4XS Not published in catalog; CE6863-48S6CQ Non-PoE. VXLAN: CE5855-48T4XS Not published in catalog; CE6863-48S6CQ Not published in catalog. MLAG: CE5855-48T4XS Not published in catalog; CE6863-48S6CQ Not published in catalog.

If PoE is required, a Non-PoE or unpublished PoE PID is the wrong shortlist. Feature flags that are empty in the catalog are not assumed enabled.

Deployment difference

CE5855-48T4XS is listed as role/layer data-center. CE6863-48S6CQ is listed as data-center. Match the role to closet vs leaf vs core; a campus access PID and a data-center leaf PID are not interchangeable even when port counts look similar.

Which model fits which scenario

Choose CE5855-48T4XS when the published downlink/uplink mix is the constraint you already designed around.

Choose CE6863-48S6CQ when you need the other PID’s published density or capacity and can accept its media type.

Selection recommendation

1) Freeze the faceplate. 2) Compare only published fields. 3) RFQ both PIDs if procurement needs a primary and a spare. 4) Ask for software/license confirmation — this catalog does not invent license packs.

Related products

FAQ

Key differences

Published deltas: Downlink ports, Uplink ports, Switching capacity, Forwarding rate. All other claims require the product pages.

Specification comparison

FieldCE5855-48T4XSCE6863-48S6CQ
Manufacturer modelCE5855-48T4XSCE6863-48S6CQ
BrandHuaweiHuawei
Downlink ports48 RJ4548 × SFP28
Uplink ports4 × SFP+6 × QSFP28
Port speedNot published in catalog25G
Layer / roledata-centerdata-center
Switching capacity336 Gbps3.6 Tbps
Forwarding rate252 Mpps940 Mpps
PoENot published in catalogNon-PoE
PoE standardNot published in catalogNot published in catalog
PoE budgetNot published in catalogNot published in catalog
Stacking / HAFront-to-back, switchableUp to 16 in-stack switches, long-reach stack links
VXLANNot published in catalogNot published in catalog
MLAGNot published in catalogNot published in catalog

Recommended scenario

Use CE5855-48T4XS vs CE6863-48S6CQ in procurement shortlists where both PIDs are already in the verified catalog. Confirm optics and software separately.

Which one should you choose?

Shortlist CE5855-48T4XS when its published port map is the fit; shortlist CE6863-48S6CQ when you need its published density/capacity. Do not substitute based on series name alone.

Related products

FAQ

Is CE5855-48T4XS a drop-in replacement for CE6863-48S6CQ?

No. Match published downlink, uplink, PoE, and capacity. Empty catalog fields are not filled from a sibling SKU.

Where do these specifications come from?

From the QianliSwitch product records for each PID. If a field is not published, this comparison leaves it blank.

Should I request a quote for both models?

Yes when both faceplates can satisfy the design. Include quantity, optics, and destination country on the RFQ.

Request a Quote Ask an expert Buying guides